Ok, this one goes to developers and power users like Tech, DavidR, Bluesman and so on... you know who you are!
I'm sure some of you will be upsetted but,
is really needed the On-Access provider when you know your system is quite clean? I mean, avast! cover all major if not all infection vectors, so why the need to have a scanner that checks time after time something you know is already clean and degrading overall system performance?
Since I
stopped the Standard Shield some days ago I noticed an inmediate boost in system performance like upgrading from my old P4 2.4ghz to a new P3 or Core 2 Duo, etc.
I think in some particular cases, like mine, having the Standard Shield on is not needed any more and it's a quite a prehistoric practice from old times when all antivirus software did was scan time after time the same files.
Today, with AVs scanning USB's, P2P, web surfing, messenger sessions, email and so on seems to be pointless to have an 'extra layer of protection' if you are not visiting dangerous sites like warez and alike or at least you check the files downloaded manually before running them.
I must say I complement avast! with a little HIPS utility that have a very light footprint, Ghost Security Suite (5mb with %0 cycles) and on demand inmunization/protection from spyware with SpyBot and SpywareBlaster. The firewall is Windows XP built-in and because the HIPS application have a network access control I can have total control over outbound connections without sacrifize CPU cycles with packet filtering and alike.
What you think?
Thanks!