Author Topic: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives  (Read 5220 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Silk0

  • Guest
Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« on: December 08, 2010, 11:56:06 PM »
The proactive test has been released... and the results are not good for Avast!  :-\

http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/retrospective-test

Offline Vlk

  • Avast CEO
  • Serious Graphoman
  • *
  • Posts: 11658
  • Please don't send me IM's. Email only. Thx.
    • ALWIL Software
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2010, 12:05:02 AM »
A detection rate of 43% (with 3-month old definitions) is a decent score for us, actually much better than the last time (when it was 29%).

Anyway, I was never a big fan of testing of AV products with outdated signatures. I believe there are much more accurate ways to assess a product's pro-activeness...

Thanks
Vlk
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving's not for you.

Silk0

  • Guest
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2010, 12:10:03 AM »
Yeah... a improvement of 14% is actually quite good...
And Avast! it's only 7% away from Advanced + rank...  ;D


BRANDONN2008

  • Guest
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2010, 02:20:16 AM »
43% is okay, but it was the second lowest of all the products tested.

Offline DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 89212
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2010, 02:48:39 AM »
Yes but as Vlk said it doesn't really mimic real life use by users, they don't let their virus definitions get to be 3 months old, they are auto update and avast has a whinge if they are out of date.

So there isn't a really good way of testing real life pro-active defence.
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD/ avast! free 24.4.6112 (build 24.4.9067.762) UI 1.0.803/ Firefox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security

Offline Maxx_original

  • Avast team
  • Super Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1479
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2010, 12:25:57 PM »
heh, try to achieve higher score when you're a mostly used AV and almost each malware author precisely tests his creations against you... why would someone write "new" well detected malware when there's a room for writing undetected malware (and the room will always be there)? we're significantly better in this round (compared to previous one) and we still don't tend to be overparanoid (we don't use massive blacklisting of packers like others do)..

Offline RejZoR

  • Polymorphic Sheep
  • Serious Graphoman
  • *****
  • Posts: 9408
  • We are supersheep, resistance is futile!
    • RejZoR's Flock of Sheep
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2010, 01:26:19 PM »
Plus this test doesn't take Network Shield into account which in real world conditions proctively blocks loads of malware. And when Behavior Shield will be fully operational (probably sometime next year), the score will go higher as well. However this test will not take it into account either (just like it doesn't Network Shield now).
Visit my webpage Angry Sheep Blog

Hexo

  • Guest
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2010, 04:13:39 PM »
If the Behavior Shield will work on 64bit systems, then i can change all my machines to avast ^^

gentle4ug

  • Guest
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2010, 04:54:56 PM »
With the "Best" still missing 40%, thats why I never (intentially) store any sensitive data on my computer.  Run IE8 in "porn" mode when performing any potenially sensitive transactions, and am looking at sanboxing to always start browsing with a clean slate.

Be careful out there.

YoKenny

  • Guest
Re: Proactive Test by AV-Comparatives
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2010, 08:57:14 PM »
If the Behavior Shield will work on 64bit systems, then i can change all my machines to avast ^^

Its working now with the latest beta.