not happy

[nsm0220]

you guys cause gdata fall it now 96.3% im not happy about this

http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart2.php

as your av fall to 93.7%

mind give me a answer of this avast team

[bob3160]

Bull. 

[nsm0220]

its on that link you know

[nsm0220]

Bull. 

its the truth my friend

[bob3160]

I saw the link and also noticed that 3.1% of possible misses have to do with user settings.

[nsm0220]

I saw the link and also noticed that 3.1% of possible misses have to do with user settings.

but ether way it affected gdata

[bob3160]

I saw the link and also noticed that 3.1% of possible misses have to do with user settings.

but ether way it affected gdata

Isn't Gdata the one that decides which AV's to use in it's program

[nsm0220]

I saw the link and also noticed that 3.1% of possible misses have to do with user settings.

but ether way it affected gdata

Isn't Gdata the one that decides which AV's to use in it's program

yes but however avast can't not play games with gdata because they will cut them out gdata don't know the report i think.i think are upset at avast for this i have feeling about this

[DavidR]

You have to look at GData as to how it implements both engines as collectively, it has a worse detection (compromised) rate than either avast or bitdefender on their own. So theoretically in combination the detection (compromised) rate should be better not worse.

This is again something you need to take up with GData as you have been told many, many times.

[nsm0220]

You have to look at GData as to how it implements both engines as collectively, it has a worse detection (compromised) rate than either avast or bitdefender on their own. So theoretically in combination the detection (compromised) rate should be better not worse.

This is again something you need to take up with GData as you have been told many, many times.

actually bitdefender have better detection rate than avast

[Pondus]

actually bitdefender have better detection rate than avast

and GData is using Bitdefender as engine A.....so why is GData having lower detection rate then Bitdefender ?




and as been said many times...you have to talk with GData 

[nsm0220]

actually bitdefender have better detection rate than avast

and GData is using Bitdefender as engine A.....so why is GData having lower detection rate then Bitdefender ?




and as been said many times...you have to talk with GData  

yes because of avast you see the 2 engine rule applies here if one engine have a high detection and if the other engine have low detection rate then it will affect whole av in a not good way in this case

[Pondus]

nope...if the Bitefender engine in Gdata does not detect the same as Bitefender it is not a avast! problem.....how could it be 


again you should ask Gdata about that result...


i have a feeling that this topic will be locked soon   

[Lisandro]

Indeed, it's surprising the decrease of avast detection.
Even K7 is higher!

Don't we deserve some words about it? Any virus analyst to post?

[Lisandro]

By the way, you can test how the detection rate decreased from January up to now...
Something is wrong...