Avast WEBforum
Consumer Products => Avast Free Antivirus / Premium Security (legacy Pro Antivirus, Internet Security, Premier) => Topic started by: spywar on March 08, 2013, 10:52:28 AM
-
Here is an excellent result from Avast against 83 undetected fresh samples.
Note that some samples were similar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cazESfuyRo
spywar
-
That's great that it can detect things, but until many users are actually able to use the program, they don't really have a point. If you look at many other threads, avast 8 has been a nightmare "upgrade" for people. It breaks flash, won't install properly, and in some cases outright nukes the users machine so they can't even reboot.
-
The problems you mention should already be fixed in the latest update.
Also, don't forget that only those having problems come to the forum; millions of users being fine don't come here to share that information.
-
Very good showcase. I wonder when will "Dyna-Gen" become live and running?
-
Very good showcase. I wonder when will "Dyna-Gen" become live and running?
I have been wondering about that too as it already seems to released according to this: http://www.avast.com/pr-protection-at-your-fingertips-the-new-avast-8
-
Very good showcase. I wonder when will "Dyna-Gen" become live and running?
I have been wondering about that too as it already seems to released according to this: http://www.avast.com/pr-protection-at-your-fingertips-the-new-avast-8
Dyna-Gen is something else than snxsql.
thanks
Vlk
-
Very good showcase. I wonder when will "Dyna-Gen" become live and running?
I have been wondering about that too as it already seems to released according to this: http://www.avast.com/pr-protection-at-your-fingertips-the-new-avast-8
Oh thanks for sharing this true indian.
spywar
-
Dyna-Gen is something else than snxsql.
thanks
Vlk
thanks for information vlk :)
-
SNXSQL would seem to me like the stuff thats getting submitted back to avast! Virus lab from Auto Sandboxed apps. The data block and the entire traceback of the execution. Which would sort of make sense but i could be wrong. SNX stands for sandbox in avast! and SQL is for database. So SNXSQL should mean sandbox trace database.
-
Very good showcase. I wonder when will "Dyna-Gen" become live and running?
I have been wondering about that too as it already seems to released according to this: http://www.avast.com/pr-protection-at-your-fingertips-the-new-avast-8
Dyna-Gen is something else than snxsql.
thanks
Vlk
Looking forward to see how Autosandbox will behave, quite sure we'll have more detections with "Dyna-gen".
-
New test : Against 15 undetected fresh malwares samples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTUJRycaiCw
Will you change the final recommendation after autosandbox analysis ? "Continue autosandboxed" recommended, etc ...
spywar
-
Some fresh tests
1.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Thh83mcdtcI
12 undetected fresh samples : 1 unable to run / 11 blocked + MBAM QUICK scan : 0 infections found.
2.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqxK5z6eViQ
spywar
-
New test : Avast! vs 21 undetected fresh samples (from 50 min to 1 hour old), conclusion : 1 did not work, 20 blocked by pro active techs. MBAM found nothing. Please watch it in HD 8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXlygXG3-QA
-
I had a malware pack composed of 20 fresh malwares samples Avast scan result : 0/20
So decided to execute the 20 samples :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmmYe4jGv9A
-
New one (+ MBAM quick scan)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9PCiyrryJs
spywar
-
2 new fresh tests against undetected fresh samples :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyIGp40EyIs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM5wUkmTtwo
spywar
-
Avast! vs 13 unknown fresh samples :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qmh3upZDFck
spywar
-
can be no difference in detecting the antivirus settings are using custom links instead of the standard
Scan potentially unwanted programs
check all compactors
try removing only the infected files, if that fails remove the full archive
applied in every module except the behavioral network
and also in the scan settings can detect much more than its original configuration.
-
can be no difference in detecting the antivirus settings are using custom links instead of the standard
Scan potentially unwanted programs
check all compactors
try removing only the infected files, if that fails remove the full archive
applied in every module except the behavioral network
and also in the scan settings can detect much more than its original configuration.
All the samples used are actually malwares (rootkits,Zacces,FakeAV,trojans,ransoms)...
I don't test with PUP.
spywar
-
New test vs 7 undetected fresh samples :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAP_bC3udRI
-
New test vs 14 undetected fresh samples :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyXcyEVEn2Y
-
youtube tests are just youtube tests and the amount of samples tested are to small....
The Holy Grail of AV Testing, and Why It Will Never Be Found
http://eugene.kaspersky.com/2011/10/18/the-holy-grail-of-av-testing-and-why-it-will-never-be-found/