Avast WEBforum

Other => General Topics => Topic started by: XMAS on October 07, 2005, 08:11:34 PM

Title: VB100 Awards (Windows 2003 Advanced Server) !!!
Post by: XMAS on October 07, 2005, 08:11:34 PM
Here's the results from the latest VB100 tests :)


Windows 2003 Advanced Server

Passed:

•AhnLab V3Net 6.0 2005.08.31.10
•avast! 4.6.497
•Command AntiVirus 4.93.0
•Avira for Windows Server 1 CA eTrust Antivirus 7.1.192 11.9.9371
•CA Vet Anti-Virus 10.67.0.0 11.9.1.0 9371
•Dr.Web 4.33.0.08190
•NOD32 1.1207
•Fortinet FortiClient 2.0.110
•F-Prot AntiVirus 3.16c
•F-Secure Anti-Virus 5.50 11110
•AntiVirusKit 15.0.5 16.230
•AntiVir 6.31.1.0
•Kaspersky Anti-Virus 5.0.50.0
•McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.0.0 4400 4571
•eScan Win 1.27
•Norman Virus Control 5.81
•BitDefender 2.0.172
•Symantec AntiVirus 10.0.0.359
•Trend Micro Server Protect 5.58.0.1060 7.510-1002 2.811.00

Failed:

•Quick Heal 2006 8.00
•AVG Anti-Virus 7.00 344
•ViRobot 2005-08-24.00
•Sophos Anti-Virus 5.0.5
•UNA PRO 1.83 269
•VirusBuster 2005 5.0.175


avast! again is great :D
Title: Re: VB100 Awards (Windows 2003 Advanced Server) !!!
Post by: DavidR on October 07, 2005, 09:30:46 PM
This is for the server edition, just in case anyone is wondering about the version tested it is different from the home/pro version number.
Title: Re: VB100 Awards (Windows 2003 Advanced Server) !!!
Post by: Thomas123 on October 08, 2005, 12:34:49 AM
AVG Anti-Virus 7.00 344 failed in the VB100 Awards. Cheers!  :D
Title: Re: VB100 Awards (Windows 2003 Advanced Server) !!!
Post by: Lisandro on October 08, 2005, 06:38:05 AM
AVG Anti-Virus 7.00 344 failed in the VB100 Awards. Cheers!  :D
When it's sunny and when it's rainy... We know we never gave this test THAT much credit.
So, now, won't blame AVG as we know how this tests are done...  8)
Title: Re: VB100 Awards (Windows 2003 Advanced Server) !!!
Post by: darth.mikey on October 08, 2005, 11:48:20 AM
AVG Anti-Virus 7.00 344 failed in the VB100 Awards. Cheers!  :D
When it's sunny and when it's rainy... We know we never gave this test THAT much credit.
So, now, won't blame AVG as we know how this tests are done...  8)

Yes Tech you're totally right they could of just missed 1 sample....