Avast WEBforum

Other => General Topics => Topic started by: iRonzel on December 15, 2010, 07:30:51 PM

Title: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: iRonzel on December 15, 2010, 07:30:51 PM
Main page (Performance tests)

http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/performance-tests

Direct link (to the results)

http://www.av-comparatives.org/images/stories/test/performance/performance_dec_2010.pdf
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: Lisandro on December 15, 2010, 08:35:32 PM
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: 12-es_csaj on December 15, 2010, 08:43:54 PM
Well, I think (because I experience) that avast! slows the systems. BUT its speed is improved , and it's lighter than it was. So I don't understand the not so good results -  for example tail-ender in "PC Mark Music".
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: CraigB on December 15, 2010, 09:09:34 PM
If they've used the same version that they used in the retospective test that was run on the 6th of december with 5.0.594 then these result's dont mean much.
Av comparatives have a bad habit of using outdated avast versions in there testing's and even with the old version i think it still scored pretty well, overall was in the top (three stars) level :)
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: GloobyGoob on December 15, 2010, 10:32:33 PM
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.

What do you mean, Tech?  ???
Avast did better than both AVG and Avira. (overall it placed 4th)

GG
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: Left123 on December 15, 2010, 10:33:42 PM
Waitin for avast 2011 :D
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: iRonzel on December 15, 2010, 10:59:09 PM
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.

What do you mean, Tech?  ???
Avast did better than both AVG and Avira. (overall it placed 4th)

GG

+1

And better than paid products
Title: Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
Post by: Lisandro on December 16, 2010, 12:37:07 AM
Maybe I've read bad the final conclusions... I don't have time now to review. Will do it later. Sorry if I misunderstood.