Annoyingly back to 1426

[Nagan]

AVAST 1426 is installed ,working fine and updated in my 64bit Win 7. As for 1456 not yet too sure that it has addressed properly the flash issue..

[SafeSurf]

I replied to you in another thread you also posted in.  http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=101747.0

[Gopher John]

Yes they are correct and I confirm that. Meanwhile what made you suspect that time and date  could be wrong? The image had been captured the day earlier to posting.

Because the expiration date of 07/08/2012 is well before the definitions update, and therefore shouldn't have updated after 07/08/2012 even though the registration graph shows you had 18 days left.  Since you verified your date/time were correct, that's not an issue.

[Nagan]

Because the expiration date of 07/08/2012 is well before the definitions update, and therefore shouldn't have updated after 07/08/2012 even though the registration graph shows you had 18 days left.  Since you verified your date/time were correct, that's not an issue.

Well for some humor .. the sequencing is british dd/mm/yy and has caught everyone unawares...

[Gopher John]

Because the expiration date of 07/08/2012 is well before the definitions update, and therefore shouldn't have updated after 07/08/2012 even though the registration graph shows you had 18 days left.  Since you verified your date/time were correct, that's not an issue.

Well for some humor .. the sequencing is british dd/mm/yy and has caught everyone unawares...

Well, the joke's on me.