My God, you people just don't stop, do you?
Now you are denigrating my signature, which you must be aware is in that banner on that forum. Now you folks have gone from denigrating just me to using the Avast organization to denigrate another organization -- denigrating a group of people you don't even know. You're just not going to stop until you achieve some goal cooked up in that Evangelist/Überevangelist sub-forum of yours.
For all I know you folks cooked this whole thing up from the get-go to try and cause me to go so far overboard you could then start a campaign to have me banned. Maybe some Avast company officials are behind this because of my post about them bowing to the Larry Page pressure. I am quite sure that Avast company officials have member privledges to allow them to read what's posted on the Evangelist/Überevangelist Group sub-forum.
Maybe you folks have just had it in for me since way back when.
Maybe this is all completely unfounded thinking, but there isn't any way we will know, right?
But on the unfounded thinking aspect stands something that is so glaring it would shine even coming out of the sun at a pilot at 10,000 feet.
With all this stampede out of that Evangelist/Überevangelist sub-forum to throw dirty water at ManyQs about how far off-topic he has been we see not one post from any of you Evangelist/Überevangelist sub-forum types that this post is off-topic.@ManyQs,
You certainly will like the contents on this site. The translation into English is here:
http://translate.google.nl/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ikhebniksteverbergen.nl%2Finternet&act=url
"I have nothing to hide" is the excuse that will provide some with the pre-text to give up their online privacy alltogether,
Now how could it be that a fair-minded group, as you will call yourselves, has not done at least one acknowledgement, in your role as forum moderators, that ManyQs has not been the only guilty party here? ManyQs already acknowledged his guilt in a response to your chief. Or is that also going to be ignored.
And in all your attempts to snatch at any little detail to turn up the flame against ManyQs it couldn't possibly have escaped your notice that the first person to use the vocabulary "privacy" in this thread was one of your own group members. Of course you didn't miss that. But that must have been the bait, right?
"Draw him out where we can shoot at him."Of course, just as I predicted you'd state that there was absolutely no personal attack in that previous shot at me you will now state that ManyQs is so off his rocker that ...
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...Now I want an official group apology for that denigration of my signature or the paperwork -- Yes! hard copy, snail mail-spending paperwork. -- is going to be asking for some heads. Maybe the ringleaders of this campaign in the Evangelist/Überevangelist Group against ManyQs have convinced you Evangelist/Überevangelist Group members this campaign against ManyQs is justified by my stances on issues that also cause headaches for the Avast company, but when you use this Avast platform to start denigrating an outside organization you have just stepped way, way out of bounds. Or you have the authority from the CEO to do what you are doing. I have no idea to what lengths you people will go to try and get a member banned, but the words written here can't be any clearer when read out on a piece of paper -- this is an orchestrated campaign and you just went too far.
As a matter of fact, I just told some folks at a dinner last night that from what all I have seen here over the past year or so I am beginning to sense that Larry Page is trying to scoop up Avast, too. And you can bet your sweet arse they are seeing this campaign with eyes that don't hasve the brown-nosing sheen of a sycophant.
Speak-Ez wants that apology. That is not a request!