Hey guys!
You both have been on the board a long time now and know the answer to that question.
There has been more lines on the forum regarding this subject than I care to read.
Avast does use more memory to do what it does than other competitors use, but Avast does it better for that reason.
A lot is going on when Avast is running, but it does not "hold" the memory longer than necessary.
In order to have a more reliable scanning engine, the memory had to be used. The alternative was to structure the scan differently which would have used less, but would not have been as reliable.
Memory or Reliability? The Avast team choose reliability and they have my vote for doing it. My system doesn't feel the 21mb usage, so why should I worry about it.
I have the best protection available for the price.
Please, lets not start this memory thing again!
Take care.