0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NOW, if you also make sure that the Heuristic feature is selected for the respective On line Access Protection modules, and you have a nice secure setup.
Thank you for taking the time to share your test results with us.
(from the Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal / Personal Pro 4.5 USER GUIDE) ...The extracting tool...can also deal with some versions of immunizers, programs protecting executable files from viruses by attaching checking code blocks (CPAV and F-XLOCK) and enciphering programs (CryptCOM) to them.
The Home version does support RAR archives (and always has).Vlk
Quote from: Vlk on October 06, 2003, 11:19:36 AMThe Home version does support RAR archives (and always has).VlkPlease, Vlk, can you confirm that Pro and Home versions use the same VPS (I mean, can detect the same virus)? I think they do but I am a little bit confused now... Btw, what is the behavior with CAB files?
Technical, indeed, avast Home and Pro both use the same engine, same samples, same kernel.The detection rates should therefore be the same as well.Version 4.0 Home lacked support for CAB archives, but these were included in 4.1.Vlk
Quote from: Vlk on October 10, 2003, 05:31:47 PMTechnical, indeed, avast Home and Pro both use the same engine, same samples, same kernel.The detection rates should therefore be the same as well.Version 4.0 Home lacked support for CAB archives, but these were included in 4.1.VlkThanks Vlk. Sorry, minacross for my simple question. I just want a confirmation of this fact. Thanks for you post.
look here http://www.avast.com/forum/index.php?board=2;action=display;threadid=1436
asafdem: I'm not sure if the detection of two variants within a single file will be "fixed". It is easily possible that a file is infected by a virus, then packed, and then infected by another virus. So, in general it's correct to announce both (all) the infections.