Some folks sometimes become confrontational here, thekochs. It's best to just ignore them and not lower oneself to that level.
However convinced Avast's fans may be that NG is the next Big Thing, there has been a distinct lack of technical description of just what NG / virtualization accomplishes for malware protection that isn't done (or can't be done) by the three shields. Some propose it's necessary to use NG without a thought to how much overhead or complexity it might add. How much overhead DOES it add (i.e., how much slower are things running)? Does it promote instability because of the increased complexity? How does Avast's NG (Virtual Box) implementation interfere with other things, for example a VMware or HyperVisor installation?
I'm not saying these things are necessarily a problem, but where is the hard info on the subject? Where are the benchmarks?
Anecdotal information will appear in time, from other users.
It's not "evil" or "disruptive" or "stupid" to make a choice not to use a new feature - Avast DOES provide a checkbox for it in the same center column as a lot of other bundled software not everyone finds necessary to use.
Never forget to consider the question: "At what price security?" Not everyone's needs are the same.
-Noel