Kerio and Comodod both passes ShieldsUP! with no problems at all. See some of those threads we started, especially the one with Comodo. I posted all those screenshots and also screenshots from ShieldsUp!!
ZA freeware doesn't pass tooleaky.exe as mentioned many times in the past. Both Comodo and Kerio, plus of course ZoneAlarm Pro can pass it with no problems. ZA free doesn't have those rules, so it will easily fail.
Here are the results of Shields Up with Kerio 4.2.2 on my machine:
GRC Port Authority Report created on UTC: 2005-12-29 at 22:42:57
Results from scan of ports: 0, 21-23, 25, 79, 80, 110, 113,
119, 135, 139, 143, 389, 443, 445,
1002, 1024-1030, 1720, 5000
0 Ports Open
0 Ports Closed
26 Ports Stealth
---------------------
26 Ports Tested
ALL PORTS tested were found to be: STEALTH.
TruStealth:
FAILED - ALL tested ports were STEALTH,
- NO unsolicited packets were received,
-
A PING REPLY (ICMP Echo) WAS RECEIVED.
I hope now maybe a Kerio user may be able to help me get a passing grade with Shields Up.
"Enable predefined network security" is checked by default on my copy of Kerio 4.2.2.
I have no dislike for Kerio. In fact one of the reasons I'm slow to return to ZA is Kerio starts up quicker than ZA when I boot my computer. The main reason I'm delaying the return to ZA is I want to be sure I've fixed the crashing problem. I've upgraded some hardware drivers & I haven't crashed since. The crashing seemed worse with Kerio than ZA. If I can get Kerio by Shields Up I may keep it as long as it gives good protection.