Hi,
we don't have this yet, but I as know we have this functionality planned to implement in the future.
Can I ask you how you imagine this function will work best for you? What exactly do you expect and what's your requirements? I would like to hear your suggestions. Thank you.
Regards
JKA
JKA,
Thanks for your response.
I am not sure what identifying characteristics you're using, but for the sake of my examples, I'll use MAC Address. I can think of two different ways that I imagine the solution working:
SOLUTION 1 - This would be the best and most efficient way of fixing the issue1. When a machine is activated, it is logged in the cloud console using it's MAC address
2. When the machine is reimaged, it still has the same MAC address, so when it's being logged in the cloud console, query to see if an existing, active record with that MAC address exists. If so, simply update the previously existing record to reflect the new changes made (Machine name, domain, OS, etc). This would prevent having to add a whole new record for the same machine. This would also prevent additional licenses from being tied up by the exact same machine.
SOLUTION 2 - This would be less desirable, less efficient, and would waste licenses, but would still work1. When a machine is activated, it is logged using the MAC address (or whatever other identifying feature you use)
2. If that same machine were reimaged, it would be logged using the same identifier.
3. The new install would continue to check in, while the previous install/entry eventually stops checking in with the server. (In our case, the old entries have not responded since 8/22/2016, while the new entries are continuing to respond.)
4. In the code, you could query to see if there are two (or more) instances/installations with the same MAC address, and if there are, de-activate (to free up the licenses) and delete the entries that are non-responsive. Leaving only the current, active install in the list, using a single license.
Please let me know if you have any other questions about how I imagine this working!
Thank you,
Dan