Regarding detection rates of Avast Home. It is true that some other AVs have a significantly greater detection rate. I say “significantly” as I consider 10% such.
I am using as my source AV Comparatives.
However, that figure does not consider other anti-malware programs, such as an AT.
In Dec, 2004 Firefighter, who frequents Wilders, ran some tests that included AVs without any help, and then combined with an anti-trojan.
Here is the thread.
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=58597Post #1 shows his results of the AVs alone. Post #17 combines certain AVs in combination with Ewido or Asquared. It does not include Avast.
Post #19 includes Avast. I realize that since those tests improvements have been made to Avast, and other AVs.
However, Avast in combination with Ewido or ASquared offers significant improvement in detection rates.
In reviewing the latest AV Comparatives tests results it is obvious that Avast suffers in comparison with some others in the area of Trojan detection.
I am not prepared to argue the results, but I do have a reasonably high confidence in the results by both Firefighter and AV Comparatives.
My own conclusion is that Avast in combination with Ewido offers a much better detection rate, and is essentially equal to all but a very few of the top AVs such as KAV.
Some AVs including KAV did not profit significantly with the addition of Ewido, but several did. In a practicable sense, Avast Home in combination with Ewido probably offers as much protection as the best. Maybe not for high risk surfing, but for many of us who never visit porn, or other high risk sites, Avast plus Ewido offers as much protection as will ever be needed.
I would like to see a test of the latest Avast with and without Ewido. It should be interesting.
AVG may pick up some steam with the addition of Ewido. I do not know how they will play that addition to Grisoft.
I am not very knowledgeable in this area, or computers in general, but these are my observations and conclusions.
Have a good day,
Jerry