Hi folks,
Some say they can live with MS verifying what they legally use, but do not own.. OK nothing wrong with that. There are only two points one can make. Why are these features always "undocumented", and are they taken on board without the end-user in mind?
These things only come to haunt you if you are unlucky. For instance you have a cd with which you can restore your OS only for the machine you have a license for (with a 30 day install restriction as well), and this machine breaks down, or you cannot use this laptop anymore for the screen has stopped functioning. The liicense says you can only use it on that particular machine, you cannot use it on a rebuild. Then you have to go to the software man and pay 4 times as much as the OEM version for e.g. Dell (which is unavailable to you), and sells for $ 35), so the repairman is not interested in letting you pay $ 170 for an OS that cost you more every year, selfbuilt computers are phasing out because of these practices). The old CD is only fit to be used as a place mat or a frisbee for the dog, because you cannot do anything else with it (if you legally proceed or live up to the terms of the eula or you have to call M$ whether they will make an exemption, which cost you an awful lot of time and energy). It is just a story to explain in what way the end-user is disappearing in the process. Iit is take it or leave it, and increasing restrictions to keep it that way. And then all sort of undocumented features are built in to see to it that end-users live by these terms set out for them. Just remember like it was in the old days. Big Brother is a Money-maker to-day.
polonus