Alright, next time and I know this isn't your decision, but could you work to include that in the patch notes, seeing something like that suddenly running and claiming to be from avast for sure made me think something had been compromised on my system, since there was NOTHING about the new process in the patch notes on this update.
Transparency is really important to me when it comes to Antivirus companies as we are trusting our systems to them.
I don't think this has anything to do with transparency - and it also may be kinda too technical for the (usually quite high-level) update notes.
I mean, this is an internal implementation detail - we also don't announce that X new DLLs appeared in the installation folder or a new driver in system folder (both are basically the same as an EXE and a new process), some other disappeared, new registry key starts being used...
As for the system looking compromised, I get that - but you can easily verify that the executable module is in our installation folder (which should normally be protected by Avast self-defense) and that it's properly signed with Avast Software digital signature. Now I would say there's no harm in mentioning it in the release notes - but since it's released gradually, I guess it might cause confusion in this particular case (people asking why the process isn't there even though according to the release notes it should be and wondering if the program works properly)... I'm not sure. (But no, I don't write the release notes
)