As a newbie, running through the thread, I have noticed that its original motive somehow got lost in mutual quarrels of particular participants.
Maybe that was the reason why no one reflected here the latest news from the firewall world, namely:
1.
Scot's decision to name Online Armor "The Best Firewall Software of 2008"
(Finnie Scot is editor in chief of Computerworld)
see:
http://blog.scotsnewsletter.com/2008/03/24/the-best-firewall-software-of-2008-online-armor/2.
100% score in Matoušek's tests, the first such result in the history of Firewall Challenge Project.
(A spicy detail of this: It was Comodo tester who first reported an OA problem to Matousek thus making Australians to speed up new version and submit it for retesting that brought this significant result.)
see:
http://www.matousec.com/projects/firewall-challenge/results.phpEventhough I strongly agree with the argument that the best firewall is the one which suits his user best, I would never undervalue thorough independent review or results from reproducible, widely accepted well-developed tests.
So my congrats to those who selected Online Armor as a part of their security suite.