Author Topic: standard shield protection  (Read 2164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

reidycat

  • Guest
standard shield protection
« on: April 26, 2008, 08:02:58 PM »
another query from newbie! should i have setting on normal or high? it is difficult to move so now i have it on high, is that ok? thanks again

Spiritsongs

  • Guest
Re: standard shield protection
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2008, 08:13:53 PM »
 :)  Hi :

 Mine is set on "High"; perhaps Others will come by on the pros and cons of
 the "High", "Normal" and "Custom" Settings !? Or you could use this Forum's
 "Search" feature to see what Others have said !?

Offline DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 89029
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: standard shield protection
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2008, 08:46:43 PM »
The Normal (default) setting provides a good balance between protection and performance. I have had it set there for four years without problem.

Now if you have a relatively fast system (you don't mention anything about it) you may not see any degradation in performance. So you could simply try it and see. Set on High it will scan every file you open and many of those will be of no or negligible risk of infection.
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD/ avast! free 24.3.6108 (build 24.3.8975.762) UI 1.0.801/ Firefox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67194
Re: standard shield protection
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2008, 09:39:59 PM »
I use 'less' than Normal even... I disable open/create/modified files to be scanned (letting only the executables and scripts to be scanned). Normal is the best balance as David said.
The best things in life are free.