Author Topic: So banks still don´t know what encryption is for  (Read 2738 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sopadeajo

  • Guest
So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« on: July 02, 2008, 06:46:43 PM »
http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kriptopolis.org%2Fcaso-citibank-revela-problemas-seguridad-pin&langpair=es|en&hl=es&ie=UTF8


And why online translators are still so incredibly bad (this one is google translator)

sopadeajo

  • Guest
So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2008, 06:51:36 PM »
http://www.kriptopolis.org/caso-citibank-revela-problemas-seguridad-pin

Sorry, i cannot post the english translation, do not know what happens.



When i copy and then paste here the result of the translation i get this:



A few days ago we reported in Kriptópolis the existence of an intrusion into Citibank servers that control the transactions of their ATMs in the commercial chain 7-Eleven, which was denounced by the bank to the FBI last February 1.

Pues bien; los detalles que se van conociendo no resultan muy tranquilizadores para los usuarios de cajeros automáticos.

Well, the details that are experiencing not very reassuring for users of ATMs.

Al parecer los intrusos esta vez ni siquiera tuvieron que tocar los cajeros, sino que interceptaron los PIN (números secretos personales) inexplicablemente sin cifrar en el lado de los ordenadores que procesan las transacciones, que cada vez con más frecuencia utilizan Microsoft Windows (esto no lo digo yo, sino The New York Times ;)...

 Apparently the intruders this time even had to touch the teller, but intercepted the PIN (personal secrets numbers) inexplicably unencrypted on the side of computers that process transactions, which increasingly use Microsoft Windows (this does not I say it myself, but The New York Times ;)...


MANUAL CORRECTION: Apparently the intruders this time did not even have to touch....

Aunque los estándares de la industria obligan a utilizar cifrado fuerte, se sospecha que algunos operadores no lo están empleando adecuadamente.

 Although industry standards require use of strong encryption, it is suspected that some operators are not used properly.

MANUAL CORRECTION: it is suspected that some operators are not using it properly

Queda por explicar cómo los intrusos ganaron acceso a los ordenadores que autorizan y procesan las operaciones de los cajeros, pero existe una progresiva tendencia a que estas máquinas puedan ser diagnosticadas y reparadas de forma remota a través de Internet.

 It remains to explain how the intruders gained access to computers which allow processing operations and cash, but there is a gradual tendency for these machines can be diagnosed and repaired by remotely via the Internet.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 04:34:50 AM by sopadeajo »

Offline DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 89116
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 07:35:53 PM »
Works for me, if you just paste the link it will break because of the special characters in it, you need to use the URL wrapper around the link, there is an option on the icons in the Topic Reply window, see image.

Code: [Select]
e.g. [url]http://66.196.80.202/babelfish/translate_url_content?lp=es_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kriptopolis.org%2Fcaso-citibank-revela-problemas-seguridad-pin&fr=avbbf-us&.intl=us[/url]
this shows that everything between the Hyperlink [URL] tags [/URL] is part of the URL string.

http://66.196.80.202/babelfish/translate_url_content?lp=es_en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kriptopolis.org%2Fcaso-citibank-revela-problemas-seguridad-pin&fr=avbbf-us&.intl=us
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD/ avast! free 24.4.6112 (build 24.4.9067.762) UI 1.0.803/ Firefox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security

sopadeajo

  • Guest
Re: So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2008, 07:55:36 PM »
 Catched it (understood it).

sopadeajo

  • Guest
Re: So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2008, 02:54:52 AM »
Google translation is better than
Babelfish one. A better algorithm; this is  a good way to know who´s working better, yet much, much more to do.

Offline DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 89116
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: So banks still don´t know what encryption is for
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2008, 02:40:03 PM »
The Google translation doesn't have as many languages supported as the Babelfish, which is the main reason I use it.

The on-line translation/converters will never be perfect, but for the most part they are workable, otherwise there is no hope of helping without them.
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD/ avast! free 24.4.6112 (build 24.4.9067.762) UI 1.0.803/ Firefox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security