I'd post on the Spybot forum and check and see if there are any conflicts with Windows Defender, Spybot and spywareguard
I would think that you do not need spywareguard AND Ttimer
but I ran both at the same time for years
back in the day some liked spywareguard more than T-timer but t-timer has been greatly improved and maintained
so some research is needed
you could also ask at the Javacool forum
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/forumdisplay.php?s=412476c543b57f0f48d569d1882f8a0b&f=23PepiMK and Javacool are two of the best
please report your findings
windows defender may be able to replace both but I have NOT seen any chart of overlapping functions of these fine products or with other free "real time anti malware procucts such as Spyware Terminator and Spyware Doctor free-
much less the pay for ones
Low WaterMark the Javacool site administrator writes
The reason for less frequent updates with SpywareGuard is that much of its detection abilities are heuristics in nature. (Basically this means it doesn't need a specific signature for every spyware it catches, simply an overall pattern or approach-used, which it can identify and then trigger off of.) So, SpywareGuard works for many of the newer versions of the same spyware installers even without adding "signatures" for them.
so it looks as if Spybot is definition based and SG is heuristics-
anyone remember how Giant> Micro Soft anti spware> windows defender does it?
perhaps Suzi at Spywarewarrior could sort it out
javacool writes in the SG updates threae
Originally Posted by Javacool
It isn't a catch-all or an end-all (nothing is), but it's meant to be an effective layer. The choice, as always, is left up to the user. I just give them that option (for free)
"
see also
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12410033?#12411725Spywareblaster and Spywareguard are aimed at IE
but can be valuable if IE is installed on a system even if another browser is primary
(and should not run very often)