Ah! You again, le doc!
Yes, I will follow you in the assumption, that they did not set up Avast! corrrectly. It seems, that they have missed the best from Avast and did run it without any proxy-facilities.
By this it would be clear, why an infectious e-mail could pass and it would be detected by Avast only at that point, where they tried to open that attachment which came with the mail.
I think I will do some explanations in the Opera discussion forum. Meanwhile I am also fan of Avast! because of its clear conceptional superiority!
But the script-blocker for Opera-Browser should be added to Avast!
Further they should think about wether it would be usefull, to extend the proxy facilities to NNTP protocol also in order to give more security in newsgroups.
I think, Opera itself is superior to other solutions, because it simply has no WSH-facilities built in. So Scripting is very limited. Further auto-popup can be disabled. To make Opera more safe, you only need to watch / scan Javascripting.
The same is true for the e-mail and newsgroup-traffic. They have no HTML-engine in it, so you simply can send only "text only".
Receiving HTML and interpreting this is limited in Opera but in this field I am still not very good informed.
All in all I would say, that Opera is more safe than Netscape 7.*
Clemens