New Matousec Results !

[dukwhunter]

Glad i stayed with Avast 5 Free & Online Armor Free !!!  Boy did NIS 2010 drop way down !

http://www.matousec.com/projects/proactive-security-challenge/results.php

AIS firewall needs more work . 

                                                                         Later
                                                                              JOEY

[superhacker]

Believe me  when you will get hacked the most up to date programs you have is what matter +powerful incoming firewall,since the real hacking need exploiting systems not put ..............,blah,blah and leaks,and what they need to polish firewalls,

[rnuis]

I think that Avast ned too work on his Firewall because it's very important too be save , i hope the firewall of Avast wi'll be as good as the one of Commodo because that one is great.

[Antarctica]

I just couln't careless for Matousec and his leak tests. He is only interested of testing the HIPS part of the Firewall, not the Firewall itself.

[superhacker]

I just couln't careless for Matousec and his leak tests. He is only interested of testing the HIPS part of the Firewall, not the Firewall itself.

+1
the really important one is the " incoming ",def+ of comodo is good in protection of malwares but it need and experience one not person with "allow"or"block"in his mind

[Lisandro]

AIS is a suite with the antimalware part. Disabling it for testing is just a way to confirm that Matousec's tests are biased (toward Comodo, for instance). They're not independent.

[Asyn]

maybe they pay better...

[Antarctica]

AIS is a suite with the antimalware part. Disabling it for testing is just a way to confirm that Matousec's tests are biased

Exactly those test are biased and flawed. Also why the heck is he testing Mamutu? as far as I know Mamutu is not even a Firewall

[Asyn]

exactly, it isn't! but it looks nicer, if the competitors get lower testing results...

[Antarctica]

exactly, it isn't! but it looks nicer, if the competitors get lower testing results...

It's only a question of $$$$$

[Asyn]

nevertheless, avast fw does! need some enhancements....

[Lisandro]

nevertheless, avast fw does! need some enhancements....

For what? To meet the Mautosec mind? For what?
Everything needs improvement. Just that Mautosec tests aren't a trustable source, are they're not independent.

[Asyn]

For what? To meet the Mautosec mind? For what?
Everything needs improvement. Just that Mautosec tests aren't a trustable source, are they're not independent.

it's never bad 2 make a good thing work better.
and no, not 4 matousec (i don't care bout these testings), but 4 all of us users!

[Bluesman]

and no, not 4 matousec (i don't care bout these testings), but 4 all of us users!

And of course is that what the devs are working with. I am sure they also want to make the software better

[Lisandro]

But for sure they're not relying in Matousec tests... They prove nothing...
About the leak tests limitations: http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=29259.msg247460#msg247460