That's correct 4.8 had no persistent caching function so it 'couldn't use it,' but that doesn't mean it was all right.
The whole point of the persistent cache has nothing to do with the thoroughness of any scan, but to avoid the pointless scanning of files that haven't changed since your last scan. Only certain files are considered for inclusion in the persistent cache, those MS files with digital signatures and other whitlisted files from other applications, etc. After the first time they have been scanned they would be included in the cache if you enabled that function.
This is all to do with the constant screaming out by users for faster scanning speed.