Author Topic: GREAT GREAT AVAST4  (Read 10558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mantra

  • Guest
GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« on: June 28, 2003, 04:25:11 PM »
I did a test with 27 mb of virii

i did a test with avast4,kaspersky,dr.web and nod32

AVAST4 missed only 1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
great

the best score kaspersky 100%

dr.web missed 20

nod32 130

techie101

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2003, 09:39:13 PM »
Yes....It is great. Isn't it!!!

 ;D

Artisan

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2003, 07:00:14 AM »
What about AVG?

mantra

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2003, 09:11:49 AM »
i did not try it!

mantra

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2003, 07:24:00 PM »
i think the trojans (remote access backdoor) avast doesn't detect...or it detect but few


i think Kerio & AVAST4 is a terrible couple

joanlui

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2003, 10:18:14 PM »
I agree! i am using Kerio 4 beta & avast 4...no problems for me!

mantra

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2003, 02:00:31 PM »
only the virus database of avast is poor if i compare with kaspersky or f-prot...and so on

joanlu di dove 6?

Waldo

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2003, 02:40:48 PM »
only the virus database of avast is poor if i compare with kaspersky or f-prot...and so on

I don't think (i'm sure) that AVAST4 has less detection possibilities as other AV's....I found the number of detected virusses & backdoor & trojans verry high.

Having a large virus databases does not mean that it is a good scanner. AVAST detects 100% of in the wild virusses and has EXCELLENT HEURISTIC features.

Wich is far more important than a large database.

As for coorperation with Kerio > no problems, and i believe that the creators of avast and Kerio hav some kind of buisness arangement, so that both products work
together verry smooth.

Greats,

Waldo
« Last Edit: July 01, 2003, 02:41:52 PM by Waldo »

Offline raman

  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1062
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2003, 03:23:19 PM »
[ AVAST detects 100% of in the wild virusses and has EXCELLENT HEURISTIC features.
Wich is far more important than a large database.

Avast uses a heuristic? The Problem with a heuristic is that the posibility of false alarms is much higher, than having a good, up to date Database.   And the more "agressive" the heuristic is, the more Malware it finds, but the more false alarms it reports.

I rate a good unpacking (UPX, ASPACK)  engine higher than a "agressive" heuristic.

But that is only my opinion. :)
MfG Ralf

joanlui

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2003, 05:04:32 PM »
No, i think Avast! is ok in virus database too...I used AVG and it is poor! F-Prot? It was my first antivirus and I like it. I use DOS version today to check Avast results...I have to say Avast and F-prot are friends... ;)


P.S. Sono italiano di Pescara, perchè?

mantra

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2003, 06:30:56 PM »
ahh
i tried to run Remote access and virii and avast4 doen't detect !!!

i think the more important thing is have a large database..like KASPERSKY (INCREDIBLE AV!!! i think the best ! really really)

i don't know the heuristic engine of avast4

Offline raman

  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1062
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2003, 06:38:10 PM »
i tried to run Remote access and virii and avast4 doen't detect !!!

Send the not detected files to Avast and they will solve this issue!:)
MfG Ralf

Waldo

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2003, 06:40:51 PM »
[ AVAST detects 100% of in the wild virusses and has EXCELLENT HEURISTIC features.
Wich is far more important than a large database.

Avast uses a heuristic? The Problem with a heuristic is that the posibility of false alarms is much higher, than having a good, up to date Database.   And the more "agressive" the heuristic is, the more Malware it finds, but the more false alarms it reports.

I rate a good unpacking (UPX, ASPACK)  engine higher than a "agressive" heuristic.


I totaly agree. But AVAST does use Heuristics, although only on its Mail providers. But with the resident shield put up to scan ALL files, no virus will run.

But a good "unpacker engine" is far most important. That's why I asked many questions (today) in this forum about the options to scan CAB's also. (microsofts archive)

A heuristic resident scanner, can indeed pull off many fals alert, wich work verry distracting, and could be dangerous, if you delete a "good" file, that is flaged by the heuristic.

Its hard to find a good  solution between "strong heuristic" and not many false alerts.

Waldo

mantra

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2003, 07:39:12 PM »
i sent them i sent
i think the great thing of avast that is incredible accurate!!!!!!!


but if i compare the avast database to kaspersky,dr.web,f-prot,norton,f-secure....is poor

joanlui

  • Guest
Re:GREAT GREAT AVAST4
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2003, 07:55:07 PM »
He told about Virii archive information! Maybe...