Author Topic: Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware  (Read 3628 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Para-Noid

  • Avast Evangelist
  • Starting Graphoman
  • ***
  • Posts: 6086
  • Trust only what you test yourself!
Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware
« on: November 18, 2010, 03:23:17 AM »
I have used both Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware and I am wanting to know why Malwarebytes conflicts with avast 5.0 and Ad-Aware does not. And does either affect virus definition updates with avast 5.0? Yes, I had a bad experience with Malwarebytes. I do know that with avast 5.0 you do not "need" either one. But do do want maximum anti-spyware/anti-malware protection...I am so sorry I had a very old version of MBAM...I recently installed the latest version and all is well. Thanks for everyones input.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2010, 12:53:41 AM by Para-Noid »
Dell Inspiron, Win10x64, MalwareBytes Premium--HP Envy Win10x64, MalwareBytes Premium,--Both systems Avast Free v2015.10.3.2225, MalwareBytes Anti-Exploit Free, Super Anti-Spyware, Spyware Blaster, MCShield, Unchecky, Firefox (latest build) and, various browser security tools.

"Look before you leap!" Use online scanners before you click on any link.

Offline RZPogi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 232
Re: Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 03:44:26 AM »
If you are using Avast pro or AIS, add malwarebytes to the exception list. Same way on the Malwarebytes side, add avast on malwarebytes exception list.

Malwarebytes is now way better than Ad-Aware. Ad-aware is not able to catch up quickly on the latest malware trend. Malwarebytes is much more updated compared to Ad-aware.
DESKTOP and LAPTOP: Win 8.1 Pro, Avast 9.0.2021 Free, Windows firewall, Malwarebytes free, Mcshield, Panda USB Vaccine, MS EMET

Offline DavidR

  • Avast √úberevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 72626
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2010, 04:18:58 AM »
I wouldn't give adaware hard disk space, it really hasn't kept pace with malware developments and in my opinion MBAM is far better.

I have no idea what your bad experience with MBAM was or what version of MBAM you have free/pro.
Core2Duo E8300/ 4GB Ram/ WinXP ProSP3/ avast! free 2015 10.4.2227 R4 beta1/ Outpost Firewall Pro9.1/ Firefox 40.0.3, NoScript, RequestPolicy/ MailWasher Pro/ DropMyRights/ MalwareBytes AntiMalware Premium 2.1.8/ WinPatrol+/ Drive Image 7.1/ SnagIt 10.0/ avast! mobile security

Offline gillest

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2010, 11:40:44 PM »
I have used both Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware and I am wanting to know why Malwarebytes conflicts with avast 5.0 and Ad-Aware does not. And does either affect virus definition updates with avast 5.0? Yes, I had a bad experience with Malwarebytes. I do know that with avast 5.0 you do not "need" either one. But do do want maximum anti-spyware/anti-malware protection

no issues with Malwarebytes and Avast 5.0 on my Win7 64 bit system.
Intel Core I7 920/ 9GB Ram/ Win7 64bits/ Avast! free 9/ Firefox & TB 16.0.1, Adblock, WOT/ MalwareBytes AntiMalware 1.6

Offline MikeBCda

  • Avast Evangelist
  • Super Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 2217
Re: Malwarebytes and Ad-Aware
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2010, 08:30:11 PM »
I'm using MBAM (free version, not resident) with avast 5 (also free version) with no problems either.  I know when avast 5 first came out there were compatibility problems with the paid version of MBAM, but I thought those had eventually gotten straightened out.

And I agree with the others about Ad-Aware, it's become little better than a disk-space hog (same's pretty much true of Spybot S&D).  If you want a good "second opinion" companion for MBAM, many of us like SUPERAntiSpyware, often referred to as SAS.
Intel Atom D2700, 2 gig RAM, Win 7 x64 SP1 & IE-11, Firefox 40.0.2 (default). 320 gig HD, 15Mb DSL, Win firewall, Avast 2015.10.3.2225 free, SpywareBlaster, MBAM Prem.,Crypto-Prevent