I’ve been contemplating this Avast 4.8 expiration issue and I have concluded it to be dangerous, unethical, and even an environmental risk.
Since there are no other “real time” free 9x alternatives, and only a few paid ones left starting at $40 U.S., many will choose to go without this protection on the Internet or chuck their machines into the landfill since many machines this dated are likely worth $100 or less.. While the data may be worth more than that the hardware it just isn't worth the yearly shell out. Linux is a nice alternative, but I know very few folks who know what version to choose, how to download and burn an ISO, or know how to configure the drivers and modem.
Secondly, without real time protection I can think of many exploits for the coming army of unprotected Avast 9x Internet users including bots designed specifically for 9x that could be written to target NT and above, DDOS, you name it.
Thirdly, Avast claims 130 million users of its product. Assuming that’s true, let’s suppose 10% are 9x users, or roughly 13 million left unprotected when Avast stops sending signatures. Many of those 13 million may not even notice the updates have stopped and will continue using Avast believing they are protected.
Lastly, those who opt out of a paid AV solution and decide to “toss” their machines out (no one recycles chipsets that old and usually charge for disposal) will be adding lead and mercury to their local landfills.
In summary, if Avast is the last “real time” free alternative for 9x users on the block, why not just continue sending automatic signature updates to their 9x clients and simply end the “program updates” and cost/overhead of 4.8 engine development? While that may not sound like a perfect solution, some protection is better than no protection. Besides, in my opinion, being the last one on the block supporting 9x users is good PR for Avasts present and future client base.
Jeffrey Brown
IT Security Specialist