Author Topic: Performance Tests (December 2010)  (Read 2530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

iRonzel

  • Guest
« Last Edit: December 15, 2010, 07:33:27 PM by Llanziel »

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67241
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2010, 08:35:32 PM »
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.
The best things in life are free.

12-es_csaj

  • Guest
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2010, 08:43:54 PM »
Well, I think (because I experience) that avast! slows the systems. BUT its speed is improved , and it's lighter than it was. So I don't understand the not so good results -  for example tail-ender in "PC Mark Music".

Offline CraigB

  • Avast √úberevangelist
  • Serious Graphoman
  • *****
  • Posts: 11157
  • No support PM's thanks
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2010, 09:09:34 PM »
If they've used the same version that they used in the retospective test that was run on the 6th of december with 5.0.594 then these result's dont mean much.
Av comparatives have a bad habit of using outdated avast versions in there testing's and even with the old version i think it still scored pretty well, overall was in the top (three stars) level :)

GloobyGoob

  • Guest
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2010, 10:32:33 PM »
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.

What do you mean, Tech?  ???
Avast did better than both AVG and Avira. (overall it placed 4th)

GG

Offline Left123

  • There Is No Patch For Human Stupidity.
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Proud Community Member&Helper.
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2010, 10:33:42 PM »
Waitin for avast 2011 :D
AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core Processor 4200+ - 2.20 GHz,3,00 GB RAM -
Browser:Mozilla Firefox +WOT - SoftWare:CCleaner - Windows 7 32 bit
No Anti-Virus

iRonzel

  • Guest
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2010, 10:59:09 PM »
avast does not get a good picture... don't you think so?
Avira is quite good in performance tests. AVG is not bad in this point also.

What do you mean, Tech?  ???
Avast did better than both AVG and Avira. (overall it placed 4th)

GG

+1

And better than paid products

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67241
Re: Performance Tests (December 2010)
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2010, 12:37:07 AM »
Maybe I've read bad the final conclusions... I don't have time now to review. Will do it later. Sorry if I misunderstood.
The best things in life are free.