Author Topic: Netlux.org  (Read 11084 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Avastfan1

  • Guest
Netlux.org
« on: January 03, 2011, 12:33:11 AM »
Is this website safe for reading about viruses?

vx.netlux.org

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 47552
  • 62 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2011, 12:39:18 AM »
Is this website safe for reading about viruses?

vx.netlux.org
URL Analysis results from VirusTotal
Firefox - Clean site
G-Data - Clean site
Google Safebrowsing - Clean site
ParetoLogic - Malware site
Phishtank - Clean site
URL info:
Normalized URL: http://vx.netlux.org/
URL MD5: 0e12e1b23793cb9067944bb11764fbce
Free avast! Security Seminar: http://bit.ly/2N1eaR2  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v21H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 22.5, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://

Offline Left123

  • There Is No Patch For Human Stupidity.
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Proud Community Member&Helper.
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2011, 12:39:51 AM »
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/vx.netlux.org#page-3
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/vx.netlux.org#page-4
   
Report    2010-12-27 07:42:27 (GMT 1)
Website    vx.netlux.org
Domain Hash    0984993f3c3fb731bad5279fa7b2ec8b
IP Address    194.44.18.83 [SCAN]
IP Hostname    labman.vxheavens.com
IP Country    UA (Ukraine)
AS Number    5598
AS Name    NETLUX-AS OOO TRK Nadezhda
Detections    2 / 17 (12 %)
Status    SUSPICIOUS
Oh my god
http://www.browserdefender.com/site/vx.netlux.org/
Viruses:   101
AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core Processor 4200+ - 2.20 GHz,3,00 GB RAM -
Browser:Mozilla Firefox +WOT - SoftWare:CCleaner - Windows 7 32 bit
No Anti-Virus

Avastfan1

  • Guest
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2011, 12:42:06 AM »
Bob says it's clean, but Left123 found 101 viruses?????!?!?!??!?!?!

Now I am really confused!

Offline Left123

  • There Is No Patch For Human Stupidity.
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Proud Community Member&Helper.
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2011, 12:45:17 AM »
Urlvoid is better than virus total.Also WOT.
AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core Processor 4200+ - 2.20 GHz,3,00 GB RAM -
Browser:Mozilla Firefox +WOT - SoftWare:CCleaner - Windows 7 32 bit
No Anti-Virus

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 47552
  • 62 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #5 on: January 03, 2011, 12:49:03 AM »
Urlvoid is better than virus total.Also WOT.
Hate to disagree with you regarding WOT
WOT isn't reliable at all  :(
Free avast! Security Seminar: http://bit.ly/2N1eaR2  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v21H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 22.5, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://

Offline Left123

  • There Is No Patch For Human Stupidity.
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Proud Community Member&Helper.
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2011, 01:27:35 AM »
Urlvoid is better than virus total.Also WOT.
Hate to disagree with you regarding WOT
WOT isn't reliable at all  :(
Is virustotal?Even if you click at a malware site that is detected by google you will see the error.Virustotal just tell you if it is detected by the browsers.Wot is based on users commens,2 full pages of bad comments about malicious activity on page are enough for me.Also did you check the link  browserdefender?101 viruses ;D

Also to prove you that i am right.I just caught a simple example.
URL VOID results for xxx.0002.in.2/18-->   Google Diagnostic    DETECTED>http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=0002.in
Virustotal-->0 /6>Google Safebrowsing   Clean site

As you can see i scanned the same site with 2 diffenent online scanners,the first detected it and i posted the warning message from google.Virustotal says 0/6=not detected by google.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 01:38:43 AM by Left123 »
AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core Processor 4200+ - 2.20 GHz,3,00 GB RAM -
Browser:Mozilla Firefox +WOT - SoftWare:CCleaner - Windows 7 32 bit
No Anti-Virus

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 47552
  • 62 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2011, 01:39:44 AM »
Quote
Wot is based on users commens,2 full pages of bad comments about malicious activity on page are enough for me
Precisely why I made the comment. Users who aren't experts.

My post simply reflected the result given by Virus Total's scanner.
They aren't my opinions.
Free avast! Security Seminar: http://bit.ly/2N1eaR2  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v21H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 22.5, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://

Offline Left123

  • There Is No Patch For Human Stupidity.
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Advanced Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1048
  • Proud Community Member&Helper.
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2011, 01:42:18 AM »
What would you do when some1 is asking your opinion?Maybe you think that the site is clean when the scanner prove something else.When you say "it's not my comment",what do you exactly mean?they lie?Why would they,at least at the 4th page i posted there is mcafee comment.I've seen comments from different av's on WOT including mcafee and panda.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2011, 01:44:27 AM by Left123 »
AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core Processor 4200+ - 2.20 GHz,3,00 GB RAM -
Browser:Mozilla Firefox +WOT - SoftWare:CCleaner - Windows 7 32 bit
No Anti-Virus

Offline George Yves

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Massive Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 4102
  • Help you I can
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2011, 06:05:35 AM »
Dr.Web online check says that though the link is clean, the site itself is in Dr.Web's malware sites database. I would strongly recommend NOT to visit this site.
May the FOSS be with you!

Altarir.

  • Guest
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2011, 11:55:13 AM »
WOT isn't reliable at all  :(

YOU aren't reliable at all :(

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 47552
  • 62 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2011, 12:02:11 PM »
WOT isn't reliable at all  :(

YOU aren't reliable at all :(
Personal attacks aren't something I or any one else on this forum enjoy.
They also have no business on this forum. >:(
Free avast! Security Seminar: http://bit.ly/2N1eaR2  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v21H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 22.5, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://

Altarir.

  • Guest
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2011, 12:22:04 PM »
nah, I was just making as silly post as yours was.


Your statement about WOT being unreliable is totally unconstructive. PROVE that it is unreliable! With some better arguments than "it's user based" nonsense. Can you?


If WOT is unreliable "because it's user-based", then why this forum, for instance, is more reliable than WOT? Most of people here are usual users, too.


I guess forums and other things which are user-based aren't to be trusted, huh? But then, what can be trusted?

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67235
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #13 on: January 03, 2011, 12:35:28 PM »
But then, what can be trusted?
1. Virus analysts and technical info of trustable sources.
2. Personal experiences of a bunch of users with good intentions.
3. God :)
The best things in life are free.

13thSlayer

  • Guest
Re: Netlux.org
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2011, 12:47:10 PM »
But then, what can be trusted?
1. Virus analysts and technical info of trustable sources.
2. Personal experiences of a bunch of users with good intentions.
3. God :)
2. Is user-based and according to bob that can't be trusted.
3.
Quote from: Tech's text on the left thingy
No fanboyism!