Author Topic: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great  (Read 18086 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Union_Thug

  • Guest
PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« on: March 05, 2011, 12:38:24 AM »
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381364,00.asp

Quote
Bottom Line

Avast! Free has some dandy new features, and it's a great-looking program. However, the new features didn't shine in my testing. It needs to do a better job cleaning up the threats it detects. Since it's free, you can give it a try and make your own decision.

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67195
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2011, 01:54:02 AM »
It will always depend on the set of the malware.
Does the test mention false positives? ;)
Besides, PC Mag is NOT independent.
The best things in life are free.

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 48524
  • 64 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2011, 02:08:05 AM »
Something about these results are just a little bit suspicious.  :o
Free Security Seminar: https://bit.ly/bobg2023  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v22H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 23.5.6066, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://bit.ly/BobGInternet

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67195
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2011, 02:14:22 AM »
Something about these results are just a little bit suspicious.  :o
What exactly did you find?
The best things in life are free.

Offline bob3160

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 48524
  • 64 Years of Happiness
    • bob3160 Protecting Yourself, Your Computer and, Your Identity
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2011, 02:17:24 AM »
Just looking at some of the ones that are rated higher.
Free Security Seminar: https://bit.ly/bobg2023  -  Important: http://www.organdonor.gov/ -- My Web Site: http://bob3160.strikingly.com/ - Win 11 Pro v22H2 64bit, 16 Gig Ram, 1TB SSD, Avast Free 23.5.6066, How to Successfully Install Avast http://goo.gl/VLXdeRepair & Clean Install https://goo.gl/t7aJGq -- My Online Activity https://bit.ly/BobGInternet

Union_Thug

  • Guest
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2011, 02:17:54 AM »
Something about these results are just a little bit suspicious.  :o

Yeah, like AdAware scoring highest. :o ???

sded

  • Guest
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2011, 03:25:52 AM »
Well, AdAware scoring highest is kind of strange.  But I think some of the other comments fit in with postings from Vlk and others from Avast that the new features are works in progress in terms of collecting and analyzing the databases that drive them.  Certainly the WebRep is barely getting started collecting, validating, and figuring out how to incorporate the user data, and the Virus Lab data isn't in the mix at all yet.  And the automatic sandbox is also in a transition phase in terms of figuring out what goes in and why.  And behavior shield is still evolving.  The tools seem to be there, but making them all work together is going to be an evolving effort.  I think Vlk said the plan was for 30-60 days to get phase I really working; and beyond that ???  The one that is of some concern is reports (and experience) with things jumping out of the manual sandbox, but I'm sure Avast! is rapidly evaluating that data.  And 3.5 bullets is not a bad phase zero; mostly indicates Avast! at least didn't compromise what they already had and that the tools are usable.  :)

Online DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 88899
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2011, 03:41:17 AM »
Well a lot also depends on what these tests were, if they were basically on-demand scans that would make quite a difference. As if they just used the pre-defined scans, Quick or Full they don't even look for PUPs and keyloggers fall into this category also.

On-demand scans for the most part are going to be scanning inert or dormant files, whereas the resident shield (FSS) scans for Viruses, PUPs and Suspicious files that are executed.

So if these files were dormant they wouldn't be detected but if run that would be a different ball game.
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD/ avast! free 24.2.6105 (build 24.2.8918.824) UI 1.0.799/ Firefox, uBlock Origin, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security

GloobyGoob

  • Guest
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2011, 06:25:58 AM »
Something about these results are just a little bit suspicious.  :o

Yeah, like AdAware scoring highest. :o ???
AdAware Internet Security uses the GData engine if I remember correctly... So that might be why it scored the highest. There are some obvious faults in this review such as the sandbox being expected to stop a keylogger from recording keystrokes (that's SafeZone's job; the sandbox should only virtualize).

Besides, PC Mag is NOT independent.
Tech, where did you hear/how do you know that PCMag isn't independant?

Offline SpeedyPC

  • Avast Evangelist
  • Massive Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 3398
  • Avast shall conquer the whole world
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2011, 06:59:02 AM »
These results smell like crap to me and it very hard if these results are telling the truth, it saw does smell like crap results just trying to impress somebody who scored the best results and trying to scared users by telling they are not doing a great job at all like saying it BULLSH >:( T!
Gigabyte 670 LGA1200 Full ATX MB | Intel Core i9-13900 CPU/LGA 1700 | GeForce Nvidia RTX-4070/12GB | 32GB DDR4 | 2 x 1TB Samsung SSD | W11 Home 64bit | Avast Premium v23.11.6090 | Avast SecureLine VPN | Avast Secure Browser | Avast Driver Updater | Avast BreachGuard | Firefox 64bit | MalwareBytes Premium | Adguard Premium | CCleaner Portable | Macrium Reflect | 7-Zip

rdmaloyjr

  • Guest
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2011, 09:45:00 AM »
AdAware uses the IKARUS antivirus engine.

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67195
Re: PCmag review of avast! Free 6.0: Good, but not Great
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2011, 12:53:24 PM »
Tech, where did you hear/how do you know that PCMag isn't independant?
1. From my readings.
2. From the common point of view that it is a magazine with business interests.
3. The partial and biased info they publish, like http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2381362,00.asp
4. Because the independent testers and certificators are: AV-Test.org, ICSA Labs, Virus Bulletin's VB100, AV-Comparatives.org and some few others (maybe).
The best things in life are free.