« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2011, 01:41:18 PM »
Para,
are you sure they encouraged you to use BOTH SAS PRO and MBAM PRO? I could see supplementing avast with EITHER SAS PRO or MBAM PRO (your decision which ONE of these two), but keeping the other only in its free (on-demand scanner) form.
My understanding is that there's a lot of duplication... and potential conflict... in resident protection in using the PRO versions of both SAS and MBAM ---- it's NOT simply a matter of "more is better". In the case of duplicative programs, "more" will at the very least result in slowdowns, and at the very worst, in conflicts/crashes.
EDIT: I see that jadinolf is using both, so I guess I may have to defer to his first-hand experience...
« Last Edit: May 28, 2011, 01:48:30 PM by ky331 »

Logged
Lenovo T530 laptop, Intel Core i5-3320M @ 2.60 GHz, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro SP1 (64-bit), avast! 17 Free, MBAM3 Pro, Windows Firewall, MVPS HOSTS file, OpenDNS Family Shield, Zemana AntiLogger Free, SpywareBlaster, IE11 & Firefox [both using WOT (IE set to WARN, FF set to BLOCK)], WinPatrol PLUS, uBlock Origin, MBAE, MCShield, CryptoPrevent, SAS (on-demand scanner).
[I believe computer-users who sandbox (Sandboxie) are acting prudently.]