Author Topic: Avast PRO vs. Norton  (Read 5303 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

darchell

  • Guest
Avast PRO vs. Norton
« on: March 24, 2005, 07:00:29 AM »
nulled
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 03:56:44 PM by nullname »

Offline RejZoR

  • Polymorphic Sheep
  • Serious Graphoman
  • *****
  • Posts: 9412
  • We are supersheep, resistance is futile!
    • RejZoR's Flock of Sheep
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2005, 07:41:24 AM »
I doubt avast! is using that much memory. 20MB would be a more reasonable number (with On-Access archive scanning enabled)
Visit my webpage Angry Sheep Blog

GYL

  • Guest
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2005, 07:47:16 AM »
have you completly uninstalled norton .you have to load an util on symantec site

darchell

  • Guest
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2005, 07:50:04 AM »
nulled
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 03:56:55 PM by nullname »

darchell

  • Guest
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2005, 07:50:36 AM »
nulled
« Last Edit: March 21, 2016, 03:57:07 PM by nullname »

sded

  • Guest
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2005, 03:03:36 PM »
XP task manager says avast! home is using about 30MB of memory right now (XP Pro SP2), so if you have the extra providers of pro, 40MB wouldn't surprise me.  20MB seems more the average.  The Norton bloat I got rid of was the support routines that were in symantec common, live update, and all the auxiliary stuff that was often problematic.   When you install symantec, it goes everywhere and keeps spawning stuff.  avast! is a simple installation, updates go quickly and efficiently, and the scanning appears to be much faster.  Plus Norton lied about scanning encrypted email, had no web scanner, and didn't provide adequate monitoring of its activities.  Customizing and seeing the results was quite a challenge.  And if I had a problem; tough!  Removed it from 3 machines, even before subscriptions were over.  Still have a new copy of NAV 2005 that I got for free in a rebate deal that will sell on eBay soon.  Or make offer. :P
« Last Edit: March 24, 2005, 04:00:52 PM by sded »

Online DavidR

  • Avast Überevangelist
  • Certainly Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 89679
  • No support PMs thanks
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2005, 03:48:18 PM »
If you check the VM Size in task manager (columns), it is a more accurate indication as explained by Vlk on numerous occasions.
Windows 10 Home 64bit/ Acer Aspire F15/ Intel Core i5 7200U 2.5GHz, 8GB DDR4 memory, 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD - 27" external monitor 1440p 2560x1440 resolution - avast! free  24.9.6130 (build 24.9.9452.762) UI 1.0.818/ Firefox, uBlock Origin Lite, uMatrix/ MailWasher Pro/ Avast! Mobile Security

Offline Lisandro

  • Avast team
  • Certainly Bot
  • *
  • Posts: 67183
Re: Avast PRO vs. Norton
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2005, 03:50:09 PM »
Without Nav or Avast loaded on the system, on a fresh boot the total commit charge (mem allocated to the OS and programs) is 162MB.
When the system is booted again with Avast loaded, the commit charge goes to between 205 and 211MB.

It's well known that the memory consumption is not accurate as David posted...
Other suggestion: disable the providers you do not use/need.
The best things in life are free.