Who says Avast! is poor with new threats?

[TrueIndian]

Well I found your active malware screenshot interesting....it had a malware name in hindi which i can read 

[Secondmineboy]

I had some malware already that i would have needed to censor

[TrueIndian]

I had some malware already that i would have needed to censor

Be sure to keep sending missed samples regardless of the reaction times thats what we are here for   

[Secondmineboy]

ts weird that i need to go back to the Index page just to be able to view new posts in this thread.

I really need to get an SSD Drive, an 500 GB HDD Drive with 5200 Rounds is not that good.
Also a bit more Ram could be useful, i have 6 GB now.

[TrueIndian]

All of my VBS malware collection from USB.Yummy Yummy 

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/1abfbfadd889eed04eef80b92babce4c860e0ba1c5bf89ef8ed5636244e4fe03/analysis/
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/d81f2b6bc13eb0e6894deb5f56b82a560ffb655f78f72f685a50363e2cfc0191/analysis/
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/801f609ef672501ed4a9d82cca6c90aab2eebbc4d87ef0b3570bcffc22b55c2d/analysis/
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/1abfbfadd889eed04eef80b92babce4c860e0ba1c5bf89ef8ed5636244e4fe03/analysis/

And this one too detected:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/0fff43d3c350b05f7bdca527a6fc4e173037615723074ade36b11416b39cfcf3/analysis/

Here these 3 missed:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/4afcc0bc6aa1035e58fdc54853c6a8f4e9d5b4a466849cf13e6226b321d89e16/analysis/|
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e09011a71e9f3ab700363da71b9c1ed65a6ee8c42081cc8c057d0447ad7d0d86/analysis/
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/7f6a18723a23b646b7ee4eb8bfc1b68f91f9aecca5834aae7f8d8383bd009284/analysis/1410594924/

All found here at my VT profile:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/user/true_indian/submissions/

2 facebook trojans:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/7bf4d0ab8fae028e469f42b57ad3bac583b4dcc46dcb1962a6133994fc2b8251/analysis/1410595303/

This one facebook trojan was caught:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/a6e997c6ba82b23ef43495254c24a301a2612926f237809a83a3eebaed90d910/analysis/1410595565/

Submitted all detected and non-detected samples to  virus AT avast DOT com for analysis.

[Secondmineboy]

Can you give a download for the undetected ones, just got an database update.

PS: 4 files left on the Malwaretips Samples now.

[TrueIndian]

Can you give a download for the undetected ones, just got an database update.

PS: 4 files left on the Malwaretips Samples now.

Nice!! So my testing results were right.Sent you a PM.

[Secondmineboy]

Lets take a look shall we?

5 files left without execution

[TrueIndian]

Lets take a look shall we?

The collection I sent you has all the detected and undetected samples and some porn crap type malware too 

[Secondmineboy]

The porn things are most likely the .exe files.

[TrueIndian]

The porn things are most likely the .exe files.

Yeah I know! Its funny how they tempt you to click them with those Icons they Use LOL 

[Secondmineboy]

5 files left after executing, some dropped files blocked and some errors from wscript.

[TrueIndian]

That's interesting so probably the malware could not do what it was supposed to do and got killed by avast when it tried to drop some files and so it must have become useless and just 2 got in.Nice to see filerep picked up the dropped binary of that facebook malware.

As I said we are getting better and better not at detecting but at protecting the user from what is lying inside a file and dont forget quick reaction times from backend technologies 

[Secondmineboy]

New pack on MT: http://malwaretips.com/threads/2014-09-13-17.33345/

Scanned the files (See screenshot) LOL

Avast detected 3/17

[TrueIndian]

OK, here we go again.
If you test 20 samples, and 19 fail... you should be asking "is there anything wrong with my sample selection?". "Did I actually choose 19 samples of the same malware family?" etc.
There are hundreds of thousands of samples out there that the particular product doesn't detect, no matter what product it is... so unless you're pretty damn sure that your selection is random, well representing the overall situation (or not - sure, you can be interested in your local malware, in which case the sample set should represent that, of course) - then no, the result is meaningless, and the correct reaction is "so what".