I must say Trial_user_Uninstalling_Avast that your attitude towards having a false positive is extraordinary. It's such a simple thing to check with other scanners, there's so many, and put it behind you 
Ahhh, thank you my friend... it is quite a sight indeed and I'm very proud of it!
By the way, it is clearly stated somewhere in my analysis that I used other engines like AVG and NAV, and that no virus was found and so I suggest improving your reading skills as a way to improve your focus level. As I've explained before, ppl waste lots of time because they don't read. As an exercise, you may go through my analysis from the beginning and take down notes of key points and marvel and its logic. Then you may post it here and I'll grade it and give you my insights
Hopefuly you've un-installed and trialling another AV. The response, or lack of it is obviously because you answered your own question in figuring avast! reported a false positive.( Exclude "IT", don't prepose there's a major glitch in Avast! )
I knew my analysis was flawless but I needed a confirmation from the support team/author. And it's clear ppl (I won't say like you
) didn't help much with their far fetched theories and protectionism, fan club like logic. I NEVER implied that this software had a major glitch. It was always in the context of my false positive and was just related to that.
Your obviously new to Anti-spyware programs . Have a great time with other AV's which in general are not even close to Avast!'s lack of "False Positives" !
Euh... what did you say, what is an "anti-spyware"? lolllll I admit to being clueless. Come on, you didn't read my post... do the little exercise;-) You are confusing anti-spyware functionality with the heuristic engine... I was talking about the shell extension for virus detection, and resident scanner for the webpage... what the
is the link with AS? Are you saying that Avast is picking up a subtle "spyware" on the page? Then why a warning on the jscript and not some dll or local component. And even then so, but what about my stripped down code? It's harmless... windows.open... I'm not talking about my car window you see...
Do not bash at other vendors... were you to refute my analysis you would be entitled to do so:)
Ah... but I almost had forgotten your very revealing analysis from very early in the posts, which is clearly confirmed today... and let me quote you, it's really worth it
:
Technically I can add nothing, but using common sense the above mentioned site is a part of a huge network of data collection sites, permeating substantially throughout the web. Visiting such a network would require plenty of realtime defence . Avast!'s response, off hand, seems quite appropriate whatever the inner workings you have defined.
I really like the "whatever the inner workings you have defined" part... as if whatever the logic may be, the response seems appropriate... 1984esque network... lots real time defence....hmmm... may I ask.... do you wear plate-mail armor? Seems like an appropriate response to me;D lollollllllllllllll
Take care of that logic there;-)
(I appreciate you commenting don't you worry
)
