SpywareBlaster

[DavidR]

Seamonkey is the old mozilla site of browser and email client.

It looks like there are remnants of firefox somewhere for it to be displayed on the list.

[hines232]

Seamonkey is the old mozilla site of browser and email client.

It looks like there are remnants of firefox somewhere for it to be displayed on the list.

Got rid of them in SpywareBlaster,(no longer detected), ran search, file, and found reminisce of them on system. Deleted files and folders, (will hold for a while) Thanks

[DavidR]

You're welcome.

[gdiloren]

I presume you are talking about spyware blaster not SAS ? What are the error messages.Are you using Spybot,there has been a conflict recently between Spybot and Spywareblaster

Yes, SpywareBlaster.(I will have to load all (protection) and get the error message and then post it for you. Later today. (No Spybot), was using it but was to confusing. Is completely off system, and reininstalled Spywareblaster.afterwords, same error.

They (spywareblaster) say they think they know what is worng, and are working on it and will let me no. When

Here is a JPG of error.

I got the same problem on VISTA but updated and opened SpywareBlaster on XP Pro without this error message or problem at all. So I guess it has to do with Vista!!

[gdiloren]

Sorry. You just have to update SB Search and Destroy to the April 17th def. to solve this problem!!!

[micky77]

  Hi Hines :

  Since your Signature indicates you are using Win ME, perhaps you should
  consider using an "older" version of SpywareBlaster, such as 3.5.1 and IF
  that does not work, the even older 3.4, available from
  www.filehippo.com/download_spywareblaster/  !?

Can give it a shot, but I have 2 of the 4 protected. I do not have "Mozilla firefox" or "Seamonky" on my system. I have IE protected and restricted sights protected. Would that not be good enought ?? Again thanks for the Info.

Why didn't you say youdidn't  have Firefox on you system,in the first place 

[DavidR]

It transpires that hines232 did still have remnants of firefox on his system that is why S&D had the firefox options in its Protection Status section.

[micky77]

It transpires that hines232 did still have remnants of firefox on his system that is why S&D had the firefox options in its Protection Status section.

I realised that David, I first thought he wanted protection for Firefox from Spywareblaster,and couldn't get it.His first 2 posts were misleading, wrong program,not saying he didn't currently have firefox.Anyway he's sorted now.Take care 

[justin1278]

I use Spyware Blaster, very useful, stops those annoying cookies and uses no system resources.

I bought the auto update subscription for $10 and am very happy with it.

[hines232]

I had uninstalled It 4 years ago, I thought !!!! Sorry.

  Hi Hines :

  Since your Signature indicates you are using Win ME, perhaps you should
  consider using an "older" version of SpywareBlaster, such as 3.5.1 and IF
  that does not work, the even older 3.4, available from
  www.filehippo.com/download_spywareblaster/  !?

Can give it a shot, but I have 2 of the 4 protected. I do not have "Mozilla firefox" or "Seamonky" on my system. I have IE protected and restricted sights protected. Would that not be good enought ?? Again thanks for the Info.

Why didn't you say youdidn't  have Firefox on you system,in the first place 

:'(