As I said in another thread, it is a piry that you did not send us the files before - actually they were detected twice (once as AutoIt and secondly as Trojan-gens) but without the files we were not able to discover the second FP.
Pavel,
I can't imagine anyone working as hard as your staff does. A post in this thread referenced an online report that averaged the results of company responses to four different infections. Three of the "averages" posted only included responses to three attacks, since the heuristics built into the virus scanners caught some viruses without having to develop a new solution.
While that speaks well of the heuristics, it clouds the issue of how fast a company responds to NEW threats. If those companies had been given an average based on THREE tests (not four), they would have fallen in the rankings.
Also, the article points out that companies that have far more staff obviously find antidotes faster. Frankly, if I compare the avast staff size (was that picture I saw posted in another thread accurate) to Kaspersky, I think I feel comfortable that you guys are doing a remarkable job.
I also assume there is some cooperation in the industry as a whole, but I might be wrong there.
There was another factor that was not considered completely in the article, though it was touched on. It doesn't matter how quickly a correction is found if you aren't informed about it. I previously used AVG. The auto-update on AVG will not automatically download an update until AT LEAST 24 HOURS after the last update. Normally, that's fine. But lately, with all the new viruses, you can wait nearly 48 hours before AVG triggers an update, depending on when the update was last done in relation to when a virus is discovered. With avast, as soon as the fix is available, it's downloaded! How good is that!
All in all, I'm very happy with avast.
P.S.
The latest update no longer reported the false alarm on that Trojan.gen file I forwarded to you. Thank you very much!