Author Topic: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?  (Read 2975 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AHRIMANSEFID

  • Guest
{REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« on: April 22, 2013, 12:48:55 PM »
Hi All.
Me Developer But Bind 2exe In Nbinder Or MoleBox Show Me Error win32:evo-gen [Susp] Why?

Offline Pondus

  • Probably Bot
  • ****
  • Posts: 37130
  • Not a avast user
Re: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2013, 01:12:15 PM »
if you think this is wrong, then click the report at false positive button you see at bottom of your picture

Offline polonus

  • Avast √úberevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 33485
  • malware fighter
Re: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2013, 01:32:04 PM »
Hi Ahriman Sefid and Pondus,

Molebox is not particularly beyond suspicion as you can establish from here: http://support.clean-mx.de/clean-mx/viruses.php?domain=molebox.com
And this to support this view: http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/molebox.com?utm_source=addon&utm_content=popup-donuts
and http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/molebox.com?utm_source=addon&utm_content=popup-donuts
To the contrary read this on false positives for this runtime packer: http://www.blitzbasic.com/Community/posts.php?topic=91762
Smart Packer pro is given as an alternative with no false positive detections....

polonus
Cybersecurity is more of an attitude than anything else. Avast Evangelists.

Use NoScript, a limited user account and a virtual machine and be safe(r)!

Offline Omid Farhang

  • Frontend Developer
  • Avast Evangelist
  • Super Poster
  • ***
  • Posts: 1660
  • I wish I could write longer personal text!!
    • Homepage
Re: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2013, 03:32:28 PM »
Hi,

You may try to scan the file in http://www.virustotal.com/ and make sure if the file is clean or not, Then if you are sure the file is flagged by mistake, report it as False-Positive via your avast installation.
Twitter: OmidFarhangEn - OS: Manjaro KDE

Offline polonus

  • Avast √úberevangelist
  • Probably Bot
  • *****
  • Posts: 33485
  • malware fighter
Re: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2013, 10:46:57 PM »
Hi folks,

On the other hand this should be taken as a compliment to the avast av coders.
Because Molebox claims
Quote
MoleBox.com: We provide "Unique packaging template for every registered user."
This for avoiding false positive antivirus alerts.

Now, what are you going to do for avoiding false positive antivirus alerts, when avast flags even this unique packaging template?
We know that avast is real good in detecting various packing methods...
This all means that in avoiding false positive av alerts Molebox failed big time...

polonus
Cybersecurity is more of an attitude than anything else. Avast Evangelists.

Use NoScript, a limited user account and a virtual machine and be safe(r)!

AHRIMANSEFID

  • Guest
Re: {REQ} win32:evo-gen [Susp] Nbinder Bind 2EXE Or MoleBox Why?
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2013, 08:08:07 AM »
Yes me send but not send me report.