And then there are people who do not trust in cleaning, go, reimage the drive from a known clean backup and then think about why did they get infected. Since - cleaning will not fix the security hole that caused the infection, right?
Well if the AV didnt block it and let it get in, it should atleast help the user clean it up dont you think?
but anyway there is no argument over the fact that Avast is better than most of the AVs available today, I personally think its better than any other product and thats why I'm using it.
The virus that got into my computer, Avast detected it in the scan, it detected it as a memory module virus only, hence it didnt let me clean it. but it didnt detect the file that injected the module to the memory. Still it did a way better job than kaspersky internet security 2011 - which was fully updated, KIS 2011 didnt detect ANYTHING! But I would have loved it if Avast pin pointed to the file that caused all this and let me remove it like MBAM did
Gargamel360 , Dieselman, Chill guys, I didnt mean to curse Avast or anything, and sorry if it came out a bit too strong. I totally agree with your comments but I would love to see them improving Avast's removal abilities and its prevention furthermore
cheers!
and BACK to the topic :p Will running 3 protection programs in real time - MBAM pro, SAS pro and Avast! IS 6 cause any problems or slow down the net speed or the performance of the pc ? because MBAM admins said that Avast admins have told that it runs perfectly together with avast. SAS admins said its designed to run parallel with any other security software.
I checked previous threads and some have said that they run well together and when I started the thread some said we have to exclude files and that it wont run well together ( 3 real time protection programs) and it all left me very confused.