AV-test results 2011 and windows 7 Version 5 and 6

[cool jay]

Hi All Av-test has the results for testing published.
Rather good read .
Well done to the Avast Team.

www.av-test.org 

[Hermite15]

thanks but no thanks

[Lisandro]

thanks but no thanks

What do you mean?

[Hermite15]

thanks but no thanks

What do you mean?

 I can't stand AV tests, whether Avast wins or loses I just... couldn't give a damned crap ... but okay that's my position

edit: + the purpose of posting such links here doesn't have the purpose to analyze the ins and outs, but to promote a product or to bash another >>> boring

[rnuis]

It are very Good On Demand scan results great job Avast , only a lot of False Positivse but then you know you are save   .

[Hermite15]

It are very Good scan results grea job Avast , only a lot of False Positivse but then you know you are save  .

see Tech , just what I was saying

[Lisandro]

edit: + the purpose of posting such links here doesn't have the purpose to analyze the ins and outs, but to promote a product or to bash another >>> boring

Well... If we start to comment the results it would be better.
No need to bash a product, but comment what avast made good and what can be improved.

[cool jay]

  I like to see who has failed and why.
Also these results are fair in that they are compared with the average and thus the real world user can see the difference between products.
What looks good is Symantec and bad McAfee.
Keep up the good work Avast.

[Silk0]

Is amazing how avast! has average results on av-test.org and had good results on AV-Comparatives and VirusBulletin. Just doesn't fit in my head.

[Nesivos]

I can just relate my 15 month or so experience with Avast Free and AIS.

1.  I am all over the Net continuously everday
2.  Besides now using AIS I use WD and SAS real time and the following programs in batch mode; Malwarebytes, Trend Micro Housecall, Hitman Pro, ESET, Dr. Cureit and even Stinger by McAfee.  
3.  Rarely and I mean rarely have these other programs including SAS and WD ever found any Malware, including Trojans, Rootkits etc that were missed by Avast.

That is good it enough for me

AIS does what it is supposed to without conflicts with other programs, is easy to configure and easy to use.

[area51]

this test is lame.. no way avast got 3.5/6

[YoKenny]

Please read:
Excellent! First comparative with avast! version 6.0
https://blog.avast.com/2011/04/14/excellent-first-comparative-with-avast-version-6-0

[cool jay]

Please read:
Excellent! First comparative with avast! version 6.0
https://blog.avast.com/2011/04/14/excellent-first-comparative-with-avast-version-6-0

Just read the above and again well done.

[DraKuL]

Is amazing how avast! has average results on av-test.org and had good results on AV-Comparatives and VirusBulletin. Just doesn't fit in my head.

same... Different test methods I guess 

Hope Avast developers look into this and improve on where they went wrong 
(As Tech said  )

[Lisandro]

Is amazing how avast! has average results on av-test.org and had good results on AV-Comparatives and VirusBulletin. Just doesn't fit in my head.

Different tests, different sample set, different methodologies.